BPH vs. MLPI
BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.
Performance
BPH vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BPH
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 19.61%
- 6M
- 18.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPH vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | -5.53% |
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | -2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPH and MLPI is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPH vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPH vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and MLPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPH | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -5.38% | -4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -2.18% | -6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -1.49% | -1.69% |
Volatility
BPH vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPH | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 13.05% | +11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 13.05% | +11.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 13.05% | +11.05% |
BPH vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPH vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison
BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than MLPI's 7.19% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.53% |
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 7.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPH and MLPI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 0.53% for BPH.
BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.68% for MLPI.
Find the right allocation for BPH and MLPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer