BPH vs. HYXF
BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and HYXF (iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while HYXF is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI US High Yield Corporate Choice ESG Screened. BPH is actively managed, while HYXF is passively managed. Their -0.50 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYXF.
Performance
BPH vs. HYXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BPH
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- 18.84%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HYXF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 4.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.46K | $52.99K | $51.54K | |
| $633.04K | $1.36M | $996.57K |
BPH vs. HYXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 5.67% |
HYXF iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPH and HYXF is -0.50, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | -0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPH vs. HYXF — Risk / Return Rank
BPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYXF
BPH vs. HYXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPH | HYXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPH vs. HYXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum HYXF drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and HYXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPH | HYXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.58% | -18.75% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.53% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.64% | -2.54% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.58% | — |
Volatility
BPH vs. HYXF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPH | HYXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.58% | 3.79% | +24.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 8.05% | +20.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 8.26% | +20.32% |
BPH vs. HYXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HYXF's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPH vs. HYXF - Dividend Comparison
BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than HYXF's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYXF iShares ESG Advanced High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.54% | 6.19% | 6.40% | 5.93% | 5.37% | 4.56% | 4.96% | 5.29% | 6.14% | 5.85% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPH and HYXF have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYXF.
HYXF has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.48% for BPH.
BPH is categorized as Energy Equities, while HYXF is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.35% for HYXF.
Find the right allocation for BPH and HYXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer