BPH vs. AAPW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) and AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian, while AAPW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.66, they often move in opposite directions. BPH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AAPW.

Performance

BPH vs. AAPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BPH

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPW

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 14.30%
• YTD: 15.21%
• 6M: 9.47%
• 1Y: 59.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPH vs. AAPW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	2.83%
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BPH and AAPW is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.66

BPH vs. AAPW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BPH	AAPW
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	19.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BPH vs. AAPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 62
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPH vs. AAPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BPH	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	9.48	0.55	+8.93

Drawdowns

BPH vs. AAPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPH drawdown since its inception was -2.35%, smaller than the maximum AAPW drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPH and AAPW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPH	AAPW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-36.28%	+33.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.85%	+1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-11.18%	+10.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BPH	AAPW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.75%	27.56%	-1.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.75%	34.72%	-8.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.75%	34.72%	-8.97%

BPH vs. AAPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AAPW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPH vs. AAPW - Dividend Comparison

BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.37%.

Position	TTM	2025
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	31.37%	28.83%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPH and AAPW in my portfolio?

BPH and AAPW have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BPH or AAPW?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPH or AAPW?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPH or AAPW?

AAPW has the higher dividend yield at 31.37%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

What is the main difference between BPH and AAPW?

BPH is categorized as Oil & Gas, while AAPW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BPH and 0.99% for AAPW.