BPGSX vs. GQFPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX).

BPGSX is managed by Boston Partners. It was launched on Dec 28, 2021. GQFPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.

Performance

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund	2.43%	32.86%	9.62%	16.44%	-5.69%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	10.08%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-2.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGSX achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 10.08% return.

BPGSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.43%
• 6M: 6.22%
• 1Y: 24.66%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GQFPX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.

BPGSX

Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund

GQFPX

GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund

Return for Risk

BPGSX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGSX

BPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 85
BPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
BPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 78
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BPGSX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.58	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	2.03	+0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.33	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	1.96	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	9.35	+1.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGSX and GQFPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BPGSX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	1.58	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.87	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between BPGSX and GQFPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

BPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.06%, more than GQFPX's 4.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BPGSX Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund	80.06%	16.14%	3.04%	1.52%	1.49%	0.00%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	4.83%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%

Drawdowns

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGSX drawdown since its inception was -22.19%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGSX and GQFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPGSX	GQFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.19%	-16.95%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.21%	-9.37%	-0.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-2.80%	+2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-3.03%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	2.08%	+0.03%

Volatility

BPGSX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Partners Global Sustainability Fund (BPGSX) is 0.00%, while GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that BPGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPGSX	GQFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	3.97%	-3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.62%	6.99%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.22%	12.37%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.37%	12.88%	+2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.37%	12.88%	+2.49%