BPGLX vs. PCGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX).
BPGLX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 30, 1992. PCGTX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Aug 24, 1995.
Performance
BPGLX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BPGLX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund | -1.90% | 19.02% | 8.56% | 9.69% | -16.82% | 8.09% | 13.84% | 19.05% | -7.56% | 17.08% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 2.74% | 7.84% | 0.98% | 5.12% | -13.48% | -0.61% | 5.75% | 6.55% | 0.17% | 2.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPGLX achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BPGLX has outperformed PCGTX with an annualized return of 6.68%, while PCGTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.63% annualized return.
BPGLX
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- -1.90%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 16.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.68%
PCGTX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BPGLX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPGLX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BPGLX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank
BPGLX
PCGTX
BPGLX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BPGLX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 1.43 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.29 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.69 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.21 | 7.64 | -1.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BPGLX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.43 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.05 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.31 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.97 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between BPGLX and PCGTX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BPGLX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison
BPGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than PCGTX's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPGLX UBS Global Allocation Fund | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.02% | 2.37% | 4.65% | 18.98% | 1.78% | 7.15% | 0.00% | 1.64% | 2.42% | 2.83% |
PCGTX PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments | 4.43% | 3.78% | 5.36% | 5.02% | 3.67% | 2.87% | 3.23% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 2.96% | 2.71% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
BPGLX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPGLX drawdown since its inception was -53.03%, which is greater than PCGTX's maximum drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGLX and PCGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPGLX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.03% | -19.34% | -33.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -3.10% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.24% | -19.20% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.37% | -19.34% | -4.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.69% | -1.57% | -5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -1.86% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.09% | +1.23% |
Volatility
BPGLX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison
UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) at 2.15%. This indicates that BPGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BPGLX | PCGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 2.15% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 4.14% | +3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 6.23% | +5.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 7.10% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 5.35% | +5.41% |