PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPGLX vs. CHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPGLX vs. CHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPGLX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than CHW's 24.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BPGLX has underperformed CHW with an annualized return of 7.51%, while CHW has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


BPGLX

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.42%
6M
9.18%
1Y
24.47%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
7.51%

CHW

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.97%
YTD
24.93%
6M
27.65%
1Y
42.52%
3Y*
26.28%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPGLX vs. CHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BPGLX
UBS Global Allocation Fund
8.42%19.02%8.56%9.69%-16.82%8.09%13.84%19.05%-7.56%17.08%
CHW
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund
24.93%19.55%27.82%14.55%-37.74%13.07%22.28%47.12%-20.33%43.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BPGLX and CHW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.67

The correlation between BPGLX and CHW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPGLX vs. CHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPGLX
BPGLX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BPGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BPGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CHW
CHW Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHW Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHW Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPGLX vs. CHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) and Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPGLXCHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.75

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

10.60

+2.01

BPGLX vs. CHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the CHW Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPGLX and CHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPGLXCHWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.68

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.32

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.57

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.29

+0.23

Drawdowns

BPGLX vs. CHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPGLX drawdown since its inception was -53.03%, smaller than the maximum CHW drawdown of -66.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPGLX and CHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPGLXCHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.03%

-66.94%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-15.51%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.25%

-20.40%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.24%

-46.11%

+23.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.37%

-53.58%

+30.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.31%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-14.88%

+9.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

4.02%

-1.96%

Volatility

BPGLX vs. CHW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS Global Allocation Fund (BPGLX) is 2.86%, while Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund (CHW) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that BPGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPGLXCHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

6.72%

-3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

13.60%

-5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

15.95%

-5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.62%

19.12%

-8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.83%

22.30%

-11.47%

BPGLX vs. CHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPGLX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CHW's 2.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPGLX vs. CHW - Dividend Comparison

BPGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than CHW's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPGLX
UBS Global Allocation Fund
1.91%2.08%2.02%2.37%4.65%18.98%1.78%7.15%0.00%1.64%2.42%2.83%
CHW
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund
6.64%8.10%8.89%10.40%13.62%8.43%8.79%9.67%12.82%9.25%12.05%11.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPGLX and CHW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHW has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to BPGLX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPGLX dropped -53.03% vs CHW's -66.94%.

CHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPGLX and CHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer