BPAY vs. PSCF
BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) and PSCF (Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. BPAY is actively managed, while PSCF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BPAY returned 10.51%/yr vs 16.36%/yr for PSCF. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BPAY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCF.
Performance
BPAY vs. PSCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than PSCF's 19.38% return.
BPAY
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -8.96%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.12%
PSCF
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 1Y
- 29.43%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.28K | $88.05K | $57.14K | |
| $415.36K | $390.86K | $204.56K |
BPAY vs. PSCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 1.06% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.32% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 19.38% | 6.19% | 15.50% | 6.02% | -11.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPAY and PSCF is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between BPAY and PSCF shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BPAY vs. PSCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BPAY
PSCF
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BPAY
PSCF
Technology
BPAY
PSCF
Consumer Cyclical
BPAY
PSCF
-
Industrials
BPAY
PSCF
Real Estate
BPAY
PSCF
Basic Materials
BPAY
-
PSCF
-
Communication Services
BPAY
-
PSCF
-
Consumer Defensive
BPAY
-
PSCF
-
Energy
BPAY
-
PSCF
-
Healthcare
BPAY
-
PSCF
-
Utilities
BPAY
-
PSCF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPAY vs. PSCF — Risk / Return Rank
BPAY
PSCF
BPAY vs. PSCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPAY | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.31 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.98 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 8.06 | -8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPAY vs. PSCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum PSCF drawdown of -45.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and PSCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPAY | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -45.46% | +11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.78% | -9.91% | -22.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.62% | -24.34% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.63% | -0.26% | -14.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -8.51% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.96% | 3.66% | +14.30% |
Volatility
BPAY vs. PSCF - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) at 4.61%. This indicates that BPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPAY | PSCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 4.61% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.41% | 11.74% | +8.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.16% | 17.14% | +9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 22.24% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 24.75% | -0.25% |
BPAY vs. PSCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPAY vs. PSCF - Dividend Comparison
BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than PSCF's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 6.71% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCF Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.48% | 3.32% | 2.93% | 1.83% | 3.57% | 4.27% | 4.21% | 2.26% | 3.01% | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPAY and PSCF have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPAY has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to PSCF (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs PSCF's -45.46%.
On 3-year performance, PSCF leads with 16.36% vs 10.51% for BPAY. On fees, PSCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSCF has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 2.10% for PSCF.
They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 0.29% for PSCF.
PSCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BPAY and PSCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer