PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPAY vs. INMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BPAY vs. INMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BPAY vs. INMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-18.60%8.54%17.28%13.19%-16.39%
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
0.28%5.52%2.77%6.50%-2.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -18.60% return, which is significantly lower than INMU's 0.28% return.


BPAY

1D
-0.02%
1M
-7.36%
YTD
-18.60%
6M
-26.54%
1Y
-4.51%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
10Y*

INMU

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
0.28%
6M
1.82%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BPAY vs. INMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than INMU's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BPAY vs. INMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

INMU
INMU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
INMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
INMU Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
INMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
INMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. INMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BPAYINMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

1.09

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.02

1.39

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.28

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.11

1.57

-1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

5.51

-5.77

BPAY vs. INMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the INMU Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and INMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BPAYINMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

1.09

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.53

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and INMU is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BPAY vs. INMU - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than INMU's 3.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.97%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%0.00%
INMU
BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF
3.39%3.48%3.47%3.44%1.92%1.14%

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. INMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, which is greater than INMU's maximum drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and INMU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BPAYINMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-10.67%

-22.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-3.15%

-30.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.23%

-2.08%

-29.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-2.86%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

0.90%

+12.87%

Volatility

BPAY vs. INMU - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to BlackRock Intermediate Muni Income Bond ETF (INMU) at 1.28%. This indicates that BPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BPAYINMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.85%

1.28%

+6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.02%

1.88%

+17.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.27%

4.35%

+24.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.19%

3.59%

+20.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.19%

3.58%

+20.61%