PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BPAY vs. BRLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BPAY vs. BRLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -10.19% return, which is significantly lower than BRLN's 1.25% return.


BPAY

1D
-1.19%
1M
0.93%
YTD
-10.19%
6M
-12.22%
1Y
-17.49%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
10Y*

BRLN

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
6.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAY vs. BRLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-10.19%8.54%17.28%13.19%-7.82%
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
1.25%5.38%7.49%13.42%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and BRLN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BPAY vs. BRLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BRLN
BRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. BRLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPAYBRLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.29

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

2.41

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

9.21

-10.19

BPAY vs. BRLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the BRLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and BRLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. BRLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, which is greater than BRLN's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and BRLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPAYBRLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.62%

-3.85%

-29.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.62%

-2.00%

-31.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.62%

-3.85%

-29.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.12%

-0.59%

-23.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-0.32%

-10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.90%

0.52%

+17.38%

Volatility

BPAY vs. BRLN - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF (BRLN) at 1.25%. This indicates that BPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPAYBRLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

1.25%

+8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.74%

2.41%

+17.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.97%

3.18%

+22.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

3.75%

+20.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

3.75%

+20.73%

BPAY vs. BRLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BRLN's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BPAY vs. BRLN - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than BRLN's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.55%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%
BRLN
BlackRock Floating Rate Loan ETF
6.36%6.50%7.87%9.06%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


BPAY and BRLN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPAY has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to BRLN (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs BRLN's -3.85%.

On 3-year performance, BPAY leads with 9.14% vs 6.90% for BRLN. On fees, BRLN is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BRLN has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BPAY has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BRLN is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.55%, compared with 6.36% for BRLN.

BPAY is categorized as Financials Equities, while BRLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 0.55% for BRLN.

BRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BPAY and BRLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer