PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BP vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BP vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BP p.l.c. (BP) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BP achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 1.48% return.


BP

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.17%
6M
19.74%
YTD
21.19%
1Y
35.64%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
7.22%

PYLD

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.23%
6M
0.95%
YTD
1.48%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BP vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BP
BP p.l.c.
21.19%24.54%-11.84%2.37%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
1.48%9.57%7.69%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BP and PYLD is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

-0.03

The correlation between BP and PYLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BP vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BP
BP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BP Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BP Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BP vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BP p.l.c. (BP) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BPPYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.03

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

9.12

-3.69

BP vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BP Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BP and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BP vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BP and PYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BPPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-4.52%

-70.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.23%

-3.25%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

-4.50%

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.76%

-0.49%

-12.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-0.64%

-24.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.58%

0.72%

+5.86%

Volatility

BP vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

BP p.l.c. (BP) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) at 0.98%. This indicates that BP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BPPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

0.98%

+8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.21%

2.67%

+19.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.32%

3.07%

+24.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.65%

3.97%

+24.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.24%

3.97%

+27.27%

Dividends

BP vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

BP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than PYLD's 6.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BP
BP p.l.c.
4.86%5.64%6.20%4.71%3.94%4.83%9.21%6.52%6.41%5.66%6.37%7.63%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.33%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BP and PYLD have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BP has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to PYLD (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BP dropped -74.94% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BP and PYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer