PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOXX vs. RMNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOXX vs. RMNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than RMNY's 2.63% return.


BOXX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
10Y*

RMNY

1D
0.24%
1M
1.04%
YTD
2.63%
6M
3.04%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOXX vs. RMNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
1.59%4.37%1.97%
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
2.63%2.35%0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BOXX and RMNY is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024

-0.03

The correlation between BOXX and RMNY shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOXX vs. RMNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOXX
BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

RMNY
RMNY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOXX vs. RMNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOXXRMNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+34.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

9.96

1.41

+8.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

59.63

3.42

+56.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

530.59

11.25

+519.34

BOXX vs. RMNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOXX Sharpe Ratio is 12.81, which is higher than the RMNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOXX and RMNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOXXRMNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81

1.98

+10.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.91

0.63

+12.28

Drawdowns

BOXX vs. RMNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum RMNY drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and RMNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOXXRMNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.12%

-5.70%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-2.28%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-1.53%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.69%

-0.68%

Volatility

BOXX vs. RMNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) is 0.09%, while Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that BOXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOXXRMNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

1.31%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

2.69%

-2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32%

3.95%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.37%

5.19%

-4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.37%

5.19%

-4.82%

BOXX vs. RMNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOXX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RMNY's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOXX vs. RMNY - Dividend Comparison

BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%.


PositionTTM20252024
BOXX
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
0.00%0.00%0.26%
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
4.30%4.10%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOXX and RMNY have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMNY has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs RMNY's -5.70%.

On 1-year performance, RMNY leads with 7.77% vs 4.09% for BOXX. On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RMNY has performed better with a 7.77% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMNY.

RMNY has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

BOXX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while RMNY is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BOXX and 0.55% for RMNY.

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.81 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOXX and RMNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer