BOXX vs. FLJH
BOXX (Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOXX is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOXX returned 4.71%/yr vs 28.86%/yr for FLJH. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BOXX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.
Performance
BOXX vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 25.30% return.
BOXX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLJH
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 26.20%
- 1Y
- 53.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.86%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- —
BOXX vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 1.72% | 4.37% | 5.16% | 5.04% | 0.07% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 25.30% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOXX and FLJH is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2022 | -0.06 |
The correlation between BOXX and FLJH shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOXX vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank
BOXX
FLJH
BOXX vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOXX | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +32.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.07 | 1.53 | +7.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 58.74 | 4.99 | +53.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 507.08 | 19.38 | +487.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOXX vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum FLJH drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and FLJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOXX | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -31.51% | +31.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.07% | -10.80% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.12% | -20.39% | +20.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -5.29% | +5.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 2.78% | -2.77% |
Volatility
BOXX vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) is 0.12%, while Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that BOXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOXX | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.12% | 5.59% | -5.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.26% | 14.21% | -13.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 18.55% | -18.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.37% | 18.62% | -18.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.37% | 19.84% | -19.47% |
BOXX vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOXX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BOXX vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison
BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 1.78% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOXX and FLJH have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJH has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to BOXX (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs FLJH's -31.51%.
On 3-year performance, FLJH leads with 28.86% vs 4.71% for BOXX. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 28.86% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.
FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.
BOXX is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while FLJH is Japan Equities. BOXX tracks Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BOXX and 0.09% for FLJH.
BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.63 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOXX and FLJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer