BOXX vs. BOC
BOXX (Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index, while BOC (Boston Omaha Corp) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, BOXX returned 4.72%/yr vs -12.35%/yr for BOC. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOXX vs. BOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOXX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than BOC's 8.16% return.
BOXX
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOC
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- 17.78%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- -5.17%
- 3Y*
- -12.35%
- 5Y*
- -16.46%
- 10Y*
- —
BOXX vs. BOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 1.60% | 4.37% | 5.16% | 5.04% | 0.07% |
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 8.16% | -12.76% | -9.85% | -40.64% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOXX and BOC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOXX vs. BOC — Risk / Return Rank
BOXX
BOC
BOXX vs. BOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) and Boston Omaha Corp (BOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOXX | BOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +12.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +37.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.69 | 1.00 | +8.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 58.95 | -0.22 | +59.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 524.63 | -0.44 | +525.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOXX | BOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68 | -0.16 | +12.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 12.89 | 0.00 | +12.89 |
Drawdowns
BOXX vs. BOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOXX drawdown since its inception was -0.12%, smaller than the maximum BOC drawdown of -76.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOXX and BOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOXX | BOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.12% | -76.58% | +76.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.07% | -23.46% | +23.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.12% | -44.53% | +44.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -71.67% | +71.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -46.08% | +46.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 11.84% | -11.83% |
Volatility
BOXX vs. BOC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) is 0.09%, while Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) has a volatility of 15.59%. This indicates that BOXX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOXX | BOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 15.59% | -15.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.25% | 22.60% | -22.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32% | 32.26% | -31.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.37% | 35.21% | -34.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.37% | 42.85% | -42.48% |
Dividends
BOXX vs. BOC - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOXX nor BOC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOXX and BOC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOC has higher volatility (15.59%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOXX dropped -0.12% vs BOC's -76.58%.
BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.68 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOXX and BOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer