BOUT vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BOUT (Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BOUT tracks the IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index while QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. BOUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

BOUT vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BOUT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: 19.69%
• YTD: 27.36%
• 1Y: 26.50%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 7.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.61%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	$64.60K	$107.52K	$108.59K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BOUT vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	21.68%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

BOUT vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOUT	QQQN
Financial Services	37.6%	-
Technology	26.9%	47.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	13.7%
Basic Materials	8.1%	1.9%
Healthcare	7.8%	19.9%
Utilities	7.0%	1.6%
Industrials	5.4%	8.7%
Real Estate	4.3%	-
Communication Services	3.3%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	1.4%
Energy	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

BOUT vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOUT

BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 46
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 50

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOUT vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOUT	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	—	—

Drawdowns

BOUT vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOUT drawdown since its inception was -36.98%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOUT and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOUT	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.98%	0.00%	-36.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.50%	0.00%	-5.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.18%	0.00%	-12.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BOUT	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.61%	0.00%	+22.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	0.00%	+19.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	0.00%	+22.97%

BOUT vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOUT vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOUT Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF	0.27%	0.34%	0.60%	1.32%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BOUT or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOUT or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOUT or QQQN?

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between BOUT and QQQN?

BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BOUT and 0.18% for QQQN.