PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOUT vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOUT vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOUT achieves a 31.39% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.33% return.


BOUT

1D
-0.01%
1M
5.85%
YTD
31.39%
6M
30.30%
1Y
35.27%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

POCT

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.01%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.92%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOUT vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
31.39%-6.77%18.82%13.27%-22.60%22.69%50.56%20.59%-28.63%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
5.33%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%9.46%10.40%12.80%-7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BOUT and POCT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.66

The correlation between BOUT and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOUT vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOUT
POCT

Technology

28.4%
36.2%

Financial Services

22.9%
11.9%

Basic Materials

9.9%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
4.9%

Industrials

9.7%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
10.1%

Utilities

7.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.9%

Energy

3.1%
3.5%

Healthcare

2.6%
8.4%

Communication Services

2.0%
10.9%

Technology

BOUT
28.4%
POCT
36.2%

Financial Services

BOUT
22.9%
POCT
11.9%

Basic Materials

BOUT
9.9%
POCT
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

BOUT
9.7%
POCT
4.9%

Industrials

BOUT
9.7%
POCT
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BOUT
8.5%
POCT
10.1%

Utilities

BOUT
7.0%
POCT
2.3%

Real Estate

BOUT
3.5%
POCT
1.9%

Energy

BOUT
3.1%
POCT
3.5%

Healthcare

BOUT
2.6%
POCT
8.4%

Communication Services

BOUT
2.0%
POCT
10.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOUT vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOUT vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOUTPOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.28

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

16.84

-7.83

BOUT vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOUT and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOUTPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.35

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.24

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.87

-0.46

Drawdowns

BOUT vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOUT drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, which is greater than POCT's maximum drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOUT and POCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOUTPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.75%

-18.80%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-4.40%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.31%

-10.22%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.28%

-10.22%

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.20%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-1.50%

-10.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

0.86%

+3.07%

Volatility

BOUT vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 0.94%. This indicates that BOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOUTPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.96%

0.94%

+5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

4.77%

+11.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

6.17%

+14.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

7.94%

+11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.93%

10.22%

+12.71%

BOUT vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than POCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOUT vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while POCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.26%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOUT and POCT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to POCT (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOUT dropped -36.75% vs POCT's -18.80%.

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.82% vs 8.25% for BOUT. On fees, POCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

POCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

BOUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.00% for POCT.

BOUT is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while POCT is Defined Outcome. BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BOUT and 0.79% for POCT.

POCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOUT and POCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer