PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOUT vs. IVOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOUT vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOUT achieves a 27.17% return, which is significantly higher than IVOG's 16.96% return.


BOUT

1D
-1.06%
1M
-2.85%
6M
19.86%
YTD
27.17%
1Y
27.33%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*

IVOG

1D
-1.05%
1M
-1.65%
6M
11.10%
YTD
16.96%
1Y
23.29%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
8.21%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOUT vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
27.17%-6.77%18.82%13.27%-22.60%22.69%50.56%20.59%-30.42%
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
16.96%7.34%15.62%17.36%-19.08%18.85%22.60%26.13%-18.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BOUT and IVOG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018

0.77

The correlation between BOUT and IVOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOUT vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOUT
BOUT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOG
IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOUT vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOUTIVOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.41

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

9.23

-2.45

BOUT vs. IVOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the IVOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOUT and IVOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOUT vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOUT drawdown since its inception was -36.98%, smaller than the maximum IVOG drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOUT and IVOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOUTIVOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.98%

-39.32%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-9.69%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.31%

-25.61%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.28%

-29.31%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-3.90%

-1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-5.85%

-6.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.53%

+1.51%

Volatility

BOUT vs. IVOG - Volatility Comparison

Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF (BOUT) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) at 5.56%. This indicates that BOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOUTIVOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

5.56%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

13.92%

+3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.51%

17.90%

+4.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.82%

20.72%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.01%

20.59%

+2.42%

BOUT vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOUT vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison

BOUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than IVOG's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOUT
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
0.27%0.34%0.60%1.32%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
0.55%0.64%0.79%1.15%1.05%0.47%0.74%1.17%1.01%0.93%1.11%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOUT and IVOG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOUT has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to IVOG (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOUT dropped -36.98% vs IVOG's -39.32%.

On 5-year performance, IVOG leads with 8.21% vs 7.49% for BOUT. On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVOG has performed better with a 8.21% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BOUT.

IVOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.27% for BOUT.

BOUT tracks IBD Breakout Stocks Total Return Index, while IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BOUT and 0.10% for IVOG.

IVOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOUT and IVOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer