BOTZ vs. VPN
BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and VPN (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while VPN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOTZ returned 2.50%/yr vs 14.89%/yr for VPN. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPN.
Performance
BOTZ vs. VPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than VPN's 51.28% return.
BOTZ
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 5.91%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.50%
- 10Y*
- —
VPN
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 51.28%
- 6M
- 54.75%
- 1Y
- 78.03%
- 3Y*
- 34.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ vs. VPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 5.91% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 19.53% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 51.28% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOTZ and VPN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.67 |
The correlation between BOTZ and VPN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
BOTZ vs. VPN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOTZ
VPN
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
BOTZ
VPN
-
Technology
BOTZ
VPN
Healthcare
BOTZ
VPN
-
Consumer Cyclical
BOTZ
VPN
-
Communication Services
BOTZ
VPN
Financial Services
BOTZ
VPN
Energy
BOTZ
VPN
-
Consumer Defensive
BOTZ
VPN
-
Basic Materials
BOTZ
VPN
-
Utilities
BOTZ
VPN
-
Real Estate
BOTZ
-
VPN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOTZ vs. VPN — Risk / Return Rank
BOTZ
VPN
BOTZ vs. VPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOTZ | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.54 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 6.05 | -4.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 18.62 | -14.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOTZ vs. VPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than VPN's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and VPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOTZ | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -38.98% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -12.89% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.02% | -24.96% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | -38.98% | -16.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.83% | -1.57% | -6.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.27% | -12.29% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.94% | 4.18% | +1.76% |
Volatility
BOTZ vs. VPN - Volatility Comparison
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) have volatilities of 9.35% and 9.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOTZ | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 9.23% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.76% | 18.31% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.23% | 22.99% | +2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 22.09% | +4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 22.07% | +3.73% |
BOTZ vs. VPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VPN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOTZ vs. VPN - Dividend Comparison
BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VPN's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.73% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOTZ and VPN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to VPN (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs VPN's -38.98%.
On 5-year performance, VPN leads with 14.89% vs 2.50% for BOTZ. On fees, VPN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VPN has been the lower-risk option at 9.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VPN has performed better with a 14.89% return vs 2.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
VPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.62% for BOTZ.
BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while VPN is Technology Equities. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.50% for VPN.
VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOTZ and VPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer