PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. VPN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. VPN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 5.91% return, which is significantly lower than VPN's 51.28% return.


BOTZ

1D
2.08%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
5.91%
6M
7.16%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*

VPN

1D
1.85%
1M
4.48%
YTD
51.28%
6M
54.75%
1Y
78.03%
3Y*
34.37%
5Y*
14.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. VPN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
5.91%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%19.53%
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
51.28%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and VPN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.67

The correlation between BOTZ and VPN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTZ vs. VPN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTZ
VPN

Industrials

49.3%

-

Technology

31.8%
30.6%

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%

-

Communication Services

4.4%
10.5%

Financial Services

0.9%
0.9%

Energy

0.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

-

58.0%

Industrials

BOTZ
49.3%
VPN

-

Technology

BOTZ
31.8%
VPN
30.6%

Healthcare

BOTZ
8.0%
VPN

-

Consumer Cyclical

BOTZ
6.4%
VPN

-

Communication Services

BOTZ
4.4%
VPN
10.5%

Financial Services

BOTZ
0.9%
VPN
0.9%

Energy

BOTZ
0.5%
VPN

-

Consumer Defensive

BOTZ
0.0%
VPN

-

Basic Materials

BOTZ
0.0%
VPN

-

Utilities

BOTZ
0.0%
VPN

-

Real Estate

BOTZ

-

VPN
58.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. VPN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VPN
VPN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPN Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. VPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZVPNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.54

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

6.05

-4.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

18.62

-14.50

BOTZ vs. VPN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the VPN Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and VPN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. VPN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than VPN's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and VPN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZVPNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-38.98%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-12.89%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-24.96%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-38.98%

-16.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-1.57%

-6.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.27%

-12.29%

-5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.94%

4.18%

+1.76%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. VPN - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) have volatilities of 9.35% and 9.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZVPNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

9.23%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.76%

18.31%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.23%

22.99%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.95%

22.09%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.80%

22.07%

+3.73%

BOTZ vs. VPN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VPN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. VPN - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VPN's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.62%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
VPN
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.73%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and VPN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to VPN (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs VPN's -38.98%.

On 5-year performance, VPN leads with 14.89% vs 2.50% for BOTZ. On fees, VPN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, VPN has been the lower-risk option at 9.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VPN has performed better with a 14.89% return vs 2.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

VPN has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.62% for BOTZ.

BOTZ is categorized as Robotics, while VPN is Technology Equities. BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.50% for VPN.

VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and VPN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer