PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTZ vs. SWPPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than SWPPX's 9.75% return.


BOTZ

1D
-4.41%
1M
-9.06%
YTD
1.13%
6M
0.29%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
9.83%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*

SWPPX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.75%
6M
8.76%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
1.13%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
9.75%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and SWPPX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.79

The correlation between BOTZ and SWPPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTZ
SWPPX

Industrials

49.3%
7.8%

Technology

31.8%
39.0%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
9.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
10.6%

Financial Services

0.9%
11.1%

Energy

0.5%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
4.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.7%

Utilities

0.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Industrials

BOTZ
49.3%
SWPPX
7.8%

Technology

BOTZ
31.8%
SWPPX
39.0%

Healthcare

BOTZ
8.0%
SWPPX
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTZ
6.4%
SWPPX
9.9%

Communication Services

BOTZ
4.4%
SWPPX
10.6%

Financial Services

BOTZ
0.9%
SWPPX
11.1%

Energy

BOTZ
0.5%
SWPPX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

BOTZ
0.0%
SWPPX
4.5%

Basic Materials

BOTZ
0.0%
SWPPX
1.7%

Utilities

BOTZ
0.0%
SWPPX
2.1%

Real Estate

BOTZ

-

SWPPX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. SWPPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOTZSWPPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

3.02

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.34

13.59

-10.25

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the SWPPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTZ and SWPPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, roughly equal to the maximum SWPPX drawdown of -55.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and SWPPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTZSWPPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.54%

-55.06%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.34%

-8.89%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-18.74%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-24.51%

-31.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.99%

-1.74%

-10.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.27%

-9.93%

-8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

1.97%

+4.04%

Volatility

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) at 4.73%. This indicates that BOTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWPPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTZSWPPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

4.73%

+5.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.13%

9.87%

+10.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.54%

12.53%

+13.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

17.02%

+10.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.83%

18.27%

+7.56%

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SWPPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTZ vs. SWPPX - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SWPPX's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.65%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%0.00%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTZ and SWPPX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOTZ has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to SWPPX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOTZ dropped -55.54% vs SWPPX's -55.06%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTZ and SWPPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer