BOTZ vs. PBOT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds. BOTZ is passively managed, while PBOT is actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BOTZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.

Performance

BOTZ vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than PBOT's 26.50% return.

BOTZ

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -3.90%
• 6M: -2.50%
• YTD: -0.78%
• 1Y: 9.01%
• 3Y*: 9.60%
• 5Y*: 1.12%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.87%

PBOT

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: 24.01%
• YTD: 26.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	$29.33M	$29.66M	$37.04M
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	$30.33K	$29.64K	$24.21K

BOTZ vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	-0.78%	-1.28%
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	26.50%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTZ and PBOT is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

BOTZ vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 19
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PBOT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOTZ vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTZ	PBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.66	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.18	—	—

Drawdowns

BOTZ vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and PBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTZ	PBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.54%	-15.78%	-39.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.65%	-6.04%	-7.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.22%	-4.52%	-13.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BOTZ	PBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	26.96%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.29%	26.96%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.89%	26.96%	-1.07%

BOTZ vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOTZ vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison

BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than PBOT's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.49%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF	0.08%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTZ and PBOT in my portfolio?

BOTZ and PBOT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOTZ or PBOT?

On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTZ or PBOT?

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for PBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOTZ or PBOT?

BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.08% for PBOT.

What is the main difference between BOTZ and PBOT?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for BOTZ and 0.70% for PBOT.