BOTZ vs. IBOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT).
BOTZ and IBOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOTZ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. IBOT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the BlueStar® Robotics Index. It was launched on Apr 5, 2023. Both BOTZ and IBOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BOTZ vs. IBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOTZ vs. IBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | -8.31% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 16.56% |
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 0.97% | 28.57% | 6.39% | 18.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOTZ achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than IBOT's 0.97% return.
BOTZ
- 1D
- 3.84%
- 1M
- -14.86%
- YTD
- -8.31%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- 1Y
- 17.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
IBOT
- 1D
- 4.22%
- 1M
- -12.19%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 6.86%
- 1Y
- 35.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOTZ vs. IBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOTZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IBOT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOTZ vs. IBOT — Risk / Return Rank
BOTZ
IBOT
BOTZ vs. IBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOTZ | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.40 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.11 | 2.02 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 2.03 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 8.12 | -5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOTZ | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.40 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOTZ and IBOT is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BOTZ vs. IBOT - Dividend Comparison
BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than IBOT's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF | 0.38% | 0.38% | 2.81% | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BOTZ vs. IBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOTZ drawdown since its inception was -55.54%, which is greater than IBOT's maximum drawdown of -25.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTZ and IBOT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOTZ | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.54% | -25.39% | -30.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.34% | -16.74% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | -13.23% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.56% | -5.18% | -13.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.29% | 4.19% | +1.10% |
Volatility
BOTZ vs. IBOT - Volatility Comparison
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) and VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) have volatilities of 8.91% and 9.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOTZ | IBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.91% | 9.33% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.65% | 16.61% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.77% | 25.61% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 21.78% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 21.78% | +3.90% |