PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTG.L vs. URND.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BOTG.L is traded in GBP, while URND.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URND.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTG.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than URND.L's 18.39% return.


BOTG.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.75%
YTD
9.21%
6M
7.98%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
9.51%
5Y*
10Y*

URND.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
-7.57%
YTD
18.39%
6M
6.04%
1Y
65.85%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
9.21%5.46%14.97%32.61%0.90%
URND.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing
18.39%47.21%5.10%25.90%-8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTG.L and URND.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022

0.48

The correlation between BOTG.L and URND.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTG.L
URND.L

Industrials

48.5%
25.8%

Technology

39.5%
1.1%

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.3%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%

-

Financial Services

0.8%

-

Energy

0.5%
58.7%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

9.4%

Industrials

BOTG.L
48.5%
URND.L
25.8%

Technology

BOTG.L
39.5%
URND.L
1.1%

Healthcare

BOTG.L
8.7%
URND.L

-

Basic Materials

BOTG.L
1.3%
URND.L
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTG.L
0.8%
URND.L

-

Financial Services

BOTG.L
0.8%
URND.L

-

Energy

BOTG.L
0.5%
URND.L
58.7%

Communication Services

BOTG.L

-

URND.L

-

Consumer Defensive

BOTG.L

-

URND.L

-

Real Estate

BOTG.L

-

URND.L

-

Utilities

BOTG.L

-

URND.L
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTG.L vs. URND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

URND.L
URND.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
URND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
URND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
URND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
URND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTG.LURND.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.15

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

5.07

+0.05

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the URND.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTG.L and URND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTG.LURND.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.32

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.58

-0.53

Drawdowns

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTG.L drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than URND.L's maximum drawdown of -40.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTG.L and URND.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTG.LURND.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-40.43%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.67%

-30.45%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

-40.43%

+9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-14.60%

+7.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-12.69%

-6.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

12.94%

-7.34%

Volatility

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) is 12.02%, while Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing (URND.L) has a volatility of 14.63%. This indicates that BOTG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTG.LURND.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

14.63%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.88%

33.57%

-13.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.30%

49.84%

-22.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.40%

39.85%

-11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

39.85%

-11.45%

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOTG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than URND.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOTG.L vs. URND.L - Dividend Comparison

BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than URND.L's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.22%0.27%0.24%0.08%0.00%
URND.L
Global X Uranium UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.17%0.00%1.19%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOTG.L and URND.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BOTG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOTG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for URND.L.

BOTG.L is categorized as Robotics, while URND.L is Commodity Producers Equities. BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while URND.L tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BOTG.L and 0.65% for URND.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTG.L and URND.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer