BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and RNRU.L (Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - BOTG.L is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while RNRU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOTG.L returned 8.09%/yr vs 2.30%/yr for RNRU.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTG.L achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than RNRU.L's 13.48% return.

BOTG.L

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -8.48%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 19.59%
• 3Y*: 8.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RNRU.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: 13.48%
• 6M: 13.49%
• 1Y: 40.22%
• 3Y*: 2.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	1.37%	5.46%	15.00%	32.59%	-36.01%	1.22%
RNRU.L Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	13.48%	24.83%	-21.90%	-19.50%	-0.25%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTG.L and RNRU.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021	0.43

Return for Risk

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTG.L

BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 25

RNRU.L

RNRU.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RNRU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RNRU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
RNRU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RNRU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOTG.L	RNRU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	2.52	-1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	3.40	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.41	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	4.28	-3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.05	16.37	-13.32

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the RNRU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTG.L and RNRU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTG.L drawdown since its inception was -57.90%, which is greater than RNRU.L's maximum drawdown of -53.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTG.L and RNRU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOTG.L	RNRU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.90%	-53.53%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.10%	-9.44%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.92%	-36.73%	+5.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.98%	-24.20%	-2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.33%	-28.97%	-10.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.41%	2.46%	+3.95%

Volatility

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (RNRU.L) at 5.11%. This indicates that BOTG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNRU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOTG.L	RNRU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.17%	5.11%	+3.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.69%	12.27%	+8.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.20%	16.06%	+12.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.79%	18.27%	+11.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.79%	18.27%	+11.52%

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOTG.L and RNRU.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

BOTG.L vs. RNRU.L - Dividend Comparison

BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while RNRU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.32%	0.27%	0.24%	0.08%
RNRU.L Global X Renewable Energy Producers UCITS ETF USD Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOTG.L and RNRU.L in my portfolio?

BOTG.L and RNRU.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BOTG.L or RNRU.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOTG.L or RNRU.L?

BOTG.L and RNRU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

What is the main difference between BOTG.L and RNRU.L?

BOTG.L is categorized as Robotics, while RNRU.L is Energy Equities. BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while RNRU.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD.