BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L
BOTG.L (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and RBOT.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Robotics funds - BOTG.L tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index while RBOT.L tracks the STOXX Global Automation & Robotics Net USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BOTG.L returned 3.79%/yr vs 15.10%/yr for RBOT.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BOTG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RBOT.L.
Performance
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BOTG.L is traded in GBP, while RBOT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RBOT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOTG.L achieves a -6.37% return, which is significantly lower than RBOT.L's 19.17% return.
BOTG.L
- 1D
- -3.54%
- 1M
- -10.20%
- 6M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT.L
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -10.16%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 19.17%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing | -6.37% | 5.46% | 15.00% | 32.59% | -36.01% | -30.00% |
RBOT.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 19.17% | 9.20% | 7.40% | 32.76% | -26.63% | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOTG.L and RBOT.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between BOTG.L and RBOT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L — Risk / Return Rank
BOTG.L
RBOT.L
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RBOT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOTG.L | RBOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.19 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 1.90 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 5.17 | -4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOTG.L drawdown since its inception was -57.90%, which is greater than RBOT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTG.L and RBOT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOTG.L | RBOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.90% | -33.83% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.64% | -13.38% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.92% | -27.59% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.56% | -12.71% | -19.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.18% | -8.31% | -30.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | 4.93% | +2.49% |
Volatility
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) is 9.84%, while iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RBOT.L) has a volatility of 10.37%. This indicates that BOTG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOTG.L | RBOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 10.37% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.09% | 21.07% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.78% | 24.76% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.86% | 22.82% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.86% | 21.98% | +7.88% |
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOTG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBOT.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOTG.L vs. RBOT.L - Dividend Comparison
BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while RBOT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTG.L Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.16% | 0.27% | 0.24% | 0.08% |
RBOT.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOTG.L and RBOT.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBOT.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBOT.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BOTG.L.
BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while RBOT.L tracks STOXX Global Automation & Robotics Net USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BOTG.L and 0.40% for RBOT.L.
Find the right allocation for BOTG.L and RBOT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer