PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BOTG.L is traded in GBP, while DRVE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DRVE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOTG.L achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than DRVE.L's 40.66% return.


BOTG.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.75%
YTD
9.21%
6M
7.98%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
9.51%
5Y*
10Y*

DRVE.L

1D
-1.76%
1M
9.58%
YTD
40.66%
6M
38.55%
1Y
89.84%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOTG.L
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing
9.21%5.46%14.97%32.61%-36.00%-6.41%
DRVE.L
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
40.66%19.86%-3.40%21.24%-27.04%-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BOTG.L and DRVE.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021

0.61

The correlation between BOTG.L and DRVE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOTG.L
DRVE.L

Industrials

48.5%
19.4%

Technology

39.5%
34.0%

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.3%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
26.8%

Financial Services

0.8%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Communication Services

-

5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

BOTG.L
48.5%
DRVE.L
19.4%

Technology

BOTG.L
39.5%
DRVE.L
34.0%

Healthcare

BOTG.L
8.7%
DRVE.L

-

Basic Materials

BOTG.L
1.3%
DRVE.L
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BOTG.L
0.8%
DRVE.L
26.8%

Financial Services

BOTG.L
0.8%
DRVE.L

-

Energy

BOTG.L
0.5%
DRVE.L

-

Communication Services

BOTG.L

-

DRVE.L
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

BOTG.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Real Estate

BOTG.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Utilities

BOTG.L

-

DRVE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOTG.L
BOTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DRVE.L
DRVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOTG.LDRVE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.58

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

8.44

-6.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

23.89

-18.77

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOTG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the DRVE.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOTG.L and DRVE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOTG.LDRVE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

3.82

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.27

-0.23

Drawdowns

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOTG.L drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than DRVE.L's maximum drawdown of -38.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOTG.L and DRVE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOTG.LDRVE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-38.87%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.67%

-10.59%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.90%

-33.14%

+2.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-2.18%

-5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-17.15%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

3.75%

+1.85%

Volatility

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF USD Distributing (BOTG.L) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (DRVE.L) at 10.49%. This indicates that BOTG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRVE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOTG.LDRVE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

10.49%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.88%

17.64%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.30%

23.43%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.40%

33.86%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

33.86%

-5.46%

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOTG.L and DRVE.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

BOTG.L vs. DRVE.L - Dividend Comparison

BOTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while DRVE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOTG.L and DRVE.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BOTG.L and DRVE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

BOTG.L is categorized as Robotics, while DRVE.L is Technology Equities. BOTG.L tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic v2 Index, while DRVE.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOTG.L and DRVE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer