BOSVX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
BOSVX is managed by Bridgeway. It was launched on Aug 31, 2011. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
BOSVX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOSVX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund | 6.76% | 9.78% | 4.21% | 18.18% | -4.27% | 48.03% | 0.83% | 13.90% | -17.15% | 5.91% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 7.13% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOSVX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BOSVX has outperformed HWSAX with an annualized return of 10.63%, while HWSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.77% annualized return.
BOSVX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 30.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
HWSAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOSVX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOSVX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOSVX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
BOSVX
HWSAX
BOSVX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 0.72 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.15 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 0.91 | +0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 3.37 | +3.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.72 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.40 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOSVX and HWSAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BOSVX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
BOSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, more than HWSAX's 0.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOSVX Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund | 9.35% | 9.99% | 9.71% | 8.55% | 21.96% | 4.12% | 1.21% | 0.99% | 10.36% | 6.66% | 0.89% | 1.00% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.65% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
BOSVX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOSVX drawdown since its inception was -57.14%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOSVX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.14% | -72.14% | +15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.60% | -16.44% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -26.98% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -53.82% | -3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -2.78% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -11.03% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 4.43% | -0.47% |
Volatility
BOSVX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value Fund (BOSVX) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that BOSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOSVX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 4.15% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.73% | 12.90% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.24% | 23.98% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 21.70% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 24.64% | +0.41% |