BOSS.DE vs. LI
BOSS.DE (Hugo Boss AG) and LI (Li Auto Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — BOSS.DE in Apparel Manufacturing, LI in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, BOSS.DE returned -1.55%/yr vs -11.84%/yr for LI. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOSS.DE vs. LI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BOSS.DE is traded in EUR, while LI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOSS.DE achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly higher than LI's -14.23% return.
BOSS.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- -15.66%
- 5Y*
- -1.55%
- 10Y*
- -0.65%
LI
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -25.13%
- YTD
- -14.23%
- 6M
- -15.04%
- 1Y
- -48.56%
- 3Y*
- -24.90%
- 5Y*
- -11.84%
- 10Y*
- —
BOSS.DE vs. LI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOSS.DE Hugo Boss AG | 9.69% | -16.48% | -31.75% | 26.40% | 2.75% | 96.23% | 14.66% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | -14.23% | -37.80% | -31.68% | 77.98% | -32.51% | 19.67% | 80.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOSS.DE and LI is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOSS.DE vs. LI — Risk / Return Rank
BOSS.DE
LI
BOSS.DE vs. LI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hugo Boss AG (BOSS.DE) and Li Auto Inc. (LI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOSS.DE | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.78 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | -0.89 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | -1.34 | +1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOSS.DE vs. LI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOSS.DE drawdown since its inception was -80.80%, which is greater than LI's maximum drawdown of -72.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOSS.DE and LI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOSS.DE | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.80% | -72.15% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.50% | -56.62% | +37.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.42% | -72.15% | +15.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.42% | -72.15% | +15.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.75% | -70.99% | +16.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.78% | -38.83% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.84% | 37.64% | -25.80% |
Volatility
BOSS.DE vs. LI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hugo Boss AG (BOSS.DE) is 6.66%, while Li Auto Inc. (LI) has a volatility of 15.00%. This indicates that BOSS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOSS.DE | LI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 15.00% | -8.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 28.56% | -16.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 40.16% | -19.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 62.57% | -32.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.03% | 67.43% | -34.40% |
Dividends
BOSS.DE vs. LI - Dividend Comparison
BOSS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while LI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOSS.DE Hugo Boss AG | 0.10% | 3.87% | 3.01% | 1.48% | 1.29% | 0.07% | 0.15% | 6.24% | 4.91% | 3.67% | 6.23% | 4.73% |
LI Li Auto Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BOSS.DE vs. LI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hugo Boss AG and Li Auto Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BOSS.DE and LI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BOSS.DE and LI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer