BOOM vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
BOOM vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOOM vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOM DMC Global Inc. | -22.12% | -8.98% | -60.95% | -3.19% | -50.92% | -8.42% | -3.27% | 28.78% | 40.52% | 58.86% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.79% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOOM achieves a -22.12% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BOOM has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of -1.78%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.65% annualized return.
BOOM
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -11.54%
- YTD
- -22.12%
- 6M
- -38.34%
- 1Y
- -38.12%
- 3Y*
- -38.10%
- 5Y*
- -37.65%
- 10Y*
- -1.78%
VONG
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOOM vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
BOOM
VONG
BOOM vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOOM | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | 0.84 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | 1.36 | -1.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.19 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.16 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.67 | 4.00 | -5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOOM | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 0.84 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.60 | 0.58 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | 0.80 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.84 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOOM and VONG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BOOM vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
BOOM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VONG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOM DMC Global Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 0.65% | 0.23% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 2.00% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
BOOM vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOOM drawdown since its inception was -96.05%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOM and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOOM | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.05% | -32.72% | -63.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.27% | -16.23% | -31.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.32% | -32.72% | -59.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.69% | -32.72% | -60.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.05% | -13.09% | -79.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.21% | -4.90% | -54.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.70% | 4.72% | +17.98% |
Volatility
BOOM vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) has a higher volatility of 12.71% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.72%. This indicates that BOOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOOM | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.71% | 6.72% | +5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.64% | 12.34% | +46.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.43% | 22.40% | +48.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.53% | 21.35% | +41.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.13% | 20.82% | +39.31% |