PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOOK.L vs. BAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Literacy Capital plc (BOOK.L) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BOOK.L is traded in GBp, while BAH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BAH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOOK.L achieves a -20.37% return, which is significantly lower than BAH's -4.11% return.


BOOK.L

1D
-2.87%
1M
-8.96%
YTD
-20.37%
6M
-17.34%
1Y
-4.27%
3Y*
-5.24%
5Y*
10Y*

BAH

1D
-0.04%
1M
6.17%
YTD
-4.11%
6M
-9.06%
1Y
-18.86%
3Y*
-8.86%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOOK.L
Literacy Capital plc
-20.37%14.38%-5.42%30.43%24.75%63.89%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-4.11%-37.79%3.79%18.25%40.65%0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BOOK.L and BAH is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2021

-0.01

Fundamentals

EPS

BOOK.L:

-£0.03

BAH:

$6.91

PS Ratio

BOOK.L:

24.90

BAH:

0.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOOK.L:

£7.39M

BAH:

$11.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOOK.L:

£6.45M

BAH:

$4.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

BOOK.L:

£0.00

BAH:

$1.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOOK.L vs. BAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOOK.L
BOOK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BOOK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOOK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOOK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BOOK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOOK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Literacy Capital plc (BOOK.L) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOOK.LBAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.94

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

-0.51

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

-0.88

+0.52

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOOK.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the BAH Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOOK.L and BAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOOK.LBAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

-0.50

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.61

+0.16

Drawdowns

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOOK.L drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, smaller than the maximum BAH drawdown of -61.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOOK.L and BAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOOK.LBAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-61.87%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.12%

-36.80%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.71%

-61.87%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.88%

-57.08%

+32.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-11.53%

+3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.17%

21.57%

-9.40%

Volatility

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Literacy Capital plc (BOOK.L) is 8.37%, while Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that BOOK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOOK.LBAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

12.29%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

32.35%

-16.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.13%

37.98%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.89%

31.50%

-7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

29.56%

-5.67%

Dividends

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison

BOOK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.79%, more than BAH's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
2.82%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%
BOOK.L
Literacy Capital plc
32.79%26.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BOOK.L vs. BAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Literacy Capital plc and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B20222023202420252026
10.63M
2.78B
(BOOK.L) Total Revenue
(BAH) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BOOK.L values in GBp, BAH values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


BOOK.L and BAH have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOOK.L and BAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer