PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOND vs. VLTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOND vs. VLTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOND achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly higher than VLTCX's -2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, BOND has outperformed VLTCX with an annualized return of 1.96%, while VLTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


BOND

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.43%
6M
-0.84%
YTD
-0.31%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
1.96%
ALL TIME*
2.88%

VLTCX

1D
0.21%
1M
-3.24%
6M
-2.68%
YTD
-2.30%
1Y
0.19%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
-3.41%
10Y*
1.58%
ALL TIME*
4.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$46.87M$49.77M$50.25M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BOND vs. VLTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
-0.31%8.39%2.77%6.48%-14.57%-0.77%7.80%8.54%0.08%4.76%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
-2.30%7.27%-1.47%11.05%-25.77%-1.16%13.68%23.19%-6.85%12.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BOND and VLTCX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012

0.79

The correlation between BOND and VLTCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOND vs. VLTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOND
BOND Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BOND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VLTCX
VLTCX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VLTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
VLTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOND vs. VLTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BONDVLTCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.03

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.21

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

0.46

+3.02

BOND vs. VLTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOND Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the VLTCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOND and VLTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOND vs. VLTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOND drawdown since its inception was -19.71%, smaller than the maximum VLTCX drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOND and VLTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BONDVLTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.71%

-34.56%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-5.34%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.21%

-10.12%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-34.56%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.71%

-34.56%

+14.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-16.80%

+14.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-8.10%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

2.44%

-1.33%

Volatility

BOND vs. VLTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) is 1.15%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VLTCX) has a volatility of 1.95%. This indicates that BOND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BONDVLTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.95%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.22%

5.70%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

7.48%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.80%

11.83%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

10.59%

-5.49%

BOND vs. VLTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOND has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VLTCX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOND vs. VLTCX - Dividend Comparison

BOND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than VLTCX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
4.81%5.11%5.02%4.06%3.44%2.58%2.66%3.38%3.18%2.87%2.85%4.14%
VLTCX
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.14%5.48%5.58%4.65%4.41%3.03%3.15%3.82%4.56%4.01%4.37%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, BOND and VLTCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VLTCX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to BOND (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOND dropped -19.71% vs VLTCX's -34.56%.

BOND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOND and VLTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer