BOIL vs. NGAS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L).
BOIL and NGAS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOIL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Natural Gas Subindex (200%). It was launched on Oct 4, 2011. NGAS.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Natural Gas Sub Total Return Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. Both BOIL and NGAS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BOIL vs. NGAS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOIL vs. NGAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOIL ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas | -29.61% | -58.98% | -60.75% | -92.00% | -31.85% | 23.84% | -74.74% | -67.70% | -20.55% | -65.72% |
NGAS.L WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF | -6.70% | -24.72% | -26.18% | -65.28% | 20.27% | 25.42% | -43.27% | -40.74% | 2.93% | -37.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a -29.61% return, which is significantly lower than NGAS.L's -6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed NGAS.L with an annualized return of -55.56%, while NGAS.L has yielded a comparatively higher -21.93% annualized return.
BOIL
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -29.61%
- 6M
- -46.25%
- 1Y
- -81.20%
- 3Y*
- -64.52%
- 5Y*
- -62.47%
- 10Y*
- -55.56%
NGAS.L
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- -6.70%
- 6M
- -12.37%
- 1Y
- -44.66%
- 3Y*
- -28.59%
- 5Y*
- -23.71%
- 10Y*
- -21.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOIL vs. NGAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NGAS.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOIL vs. NGAS.L — Risk / Return Rank
BOIL
NGAS.L
BOIL vs. NGAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOIL | NGAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | -0.77 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | -0.99 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.83 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.28 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOIL | NGAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -0.77 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 | -0.40 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 | -0.43 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | -0.59 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOIL and NGAS.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BOIL vs. NGAS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOIL nor NGAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BOIL vs. NGAS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum NGAS.L drawdown of -99.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and NGAS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOIL | NGAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.91% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.53% | -52.24% | -29.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.88% | -93.11% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -94.90% | -5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -99.90% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | -88.99% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.91% | 33.88% | +27.03% |
Volatility
BOIL vs. NGAS.L - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 29.44% compared to WisdomTree Natural Gas ETF (NGAS.L) at 15.95%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NGAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOIL | NGAS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.44% | 15.95% | +13.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.34% | 48.53% | +60.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.51% | 57.96% | +62.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.61% | 58.82% | +59.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.94% | 50.64% | +51.30% |