PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOEU vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOEU vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily BA Bull 2X Shares (BOEU) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEU achieves a -13.65% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.


BOEU

1D
-6.22%
1M
-10.91%
YTD
-13.65%
6M
-1.79%
1Y
-20.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.79%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEU vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOEU and RBIL is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOEU vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOEU
BOEU Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BOEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOEU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BOEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOEU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOEU vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BA Bull 2X Shares (BOEU) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOEURBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.33

5.01

-5.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.08

7.92

-8.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

2.39

-1.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

17.00

-17.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.93

70.66

-71.59

BOEU vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOEU Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOEU and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOEURBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

5.01

-5.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

4.28

-3.99

Drawdowns

BOEU vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEU drawdown since its inception was -46.03%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEU and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOEURBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.03%

-0.50%

-45.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.03%

-0.27%

-45.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.12%

0.00%

-35.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.01%

-0.06%

-16.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.30%

0.07%

+22.23%

Volatility

BOEU vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily BA Bull 2X Shares (BOEU) has a higher volatility of 22.00% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that BOEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOEURBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.00%

0.30%

+21.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.68%

0.79%

+47.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.43%

0.92%

+62.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.02%

1.05%

+60.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.02%

1.05%

+60.97%

BOEU vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOEU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOEU vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

BOEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOEU and RBIL have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOEU has higher volatility (22.00%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOEU dropped -46.03% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.57% vs -20.69% for BOEU. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.57% return vs -20.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BOEU.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.17% for BOEU.

BOEU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BOEU and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOEU and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer