BOEG vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOEG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BOEG returned -0.44% vs 39.64% for PIT. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. BOEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

BOEG vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.

BOEG

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: -7.07%
• 6M: -7.05%
• 1Y: -0.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -11.78%
• YTD: 25.62%
• 6M: 23.58%
• 1Y: 39.64%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEG vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	-7.07%	6.85%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	25.62%	12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BOEG and PIT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

BOEG vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOEG

BOEG Risk / Return Rank: 10
BOEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BOEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BOEG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BOEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BOEG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 57
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOEG vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOEG	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	1.85	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	2.40	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.33	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	2.62	-2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.02	10.88	-10.90

BOEG vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOEG Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOEG and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOEG vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOEG	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.47%	-15.19%	-31.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.47%	-15.19%	-31.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.23%	-15.19%	-15.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.52%	-4.08%	-15.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.39%	3.66%	+19.73%

Volatility

BOEG vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 4.72%. This indicates that BOEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOEG	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.41%	4.72%	+16.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.04%	19.40%	+27.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.38%	21.66%	+42.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.07%	17.50%	+46.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.07%	17.50%	+46.57%

BOEG vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOEG vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

BOEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.10%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOEG and PIT in my portfolio?

BOEG and PIT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOEG or PIT?

BOEG has higher volatility (21.41%) compared to PIT (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOEG dropped -46.47% vs PIT's -15.19%.

Which ETF is better, BOEG or PIT?

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 39.64% vs -0.44% for BOEG. On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOEG or PIT?

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 39.64% return vs -0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOEG or PIT?

PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BOEG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOEG or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 0.00% for BOEG.

What is the main difference between BOEG and PIT?

BOEG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.