BOEG vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOEG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. BOEG is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, BOEG returned -0.44% vs 29.82% for EINC. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. BOEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

BOEG vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

BOEG

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: -7.07%
• 6M: -7.05%
• 1Y: -0.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 6M: 25.98%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 30.36%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEG vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	-7.07%	6.85%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	25.97%	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BOEG and EINC is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

BOEG vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOEG

BOEG Risk / Return Rank: 10
BOEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BOEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BOEG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BOEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BOEG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 64
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOEG vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOEG	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	1.99	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	2.67	-2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.35	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	3.80	-3.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.02	9.63	-9.65

BOEG vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOEG Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOEG and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOEG vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOEG	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.47%	-87.55%	+41.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.47%	-7.89%	-38.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.23%	-4.50%	-25.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.52%	-44.15%	+24.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.39%	3.10%	+20.29%

Volatility

BOEG vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that BOEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOEG	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.41%	6.51%	+14.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.04%	11.88%	+35.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.38%	15.10%	+49.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.07%	19.54%	+44.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.07%	25.43%	+38.64%

BOEG vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOEG vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

BOEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.51%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOEG and EINC in my portfolio?

BOEG and EINC have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOEG or EINC?

BOEG has higher volatility (21.41%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOEG dropped -46.47% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, BOEG or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 29.82% vs -0.44% for BOEG. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOEG or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 29.82% return vs -0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOEG or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BOEG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOEG or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.00% for BOEG.

What is the main difference between BOEG and EINC?

BOEG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.