BOEG vs. EEV
BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) and EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BOEG is actively managed, while EEV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. BOEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EEV.
Performance
BOEG vs. EEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly higher than EEV's -40.73% return.
BOEG
- 1D
- 6.29%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- -8.79%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EEV
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -11.85%
- YTD
- -40.73%
- 6M
- -43.04%
- 1Y
- -57.95%
- 3Y*
- -33.83%
- 5Y*
- -15.23%
- 10Y*
- -23.80%
BOEG vs. EEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | -8.79% | 6.85% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | -40.73% | -27.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOEG and EEV is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOEG vs. EEV — Risk / Return Rank
BOEG
EEV
BOEG vs. EEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOEG | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | -0.47 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
BOEG vs. EEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum EEV drawdown of -99.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and EEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOEG | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.47% | -99.87% | +53.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -59.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -76.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -80.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.52% | -99.87% | +68.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.11% | -93.00% | +73.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.75% | — |
Volatility
BOEG vs. EEV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOEG | EEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.57% | 40.46% | +23.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.57% | 38.25% | +25.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.57% | 41.13% | +22.44% |
BOEG vs. EEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EEV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOEG vs. EEV - Dividend Comparison
BOEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets | 7.30% | 5.40% | 4.45% | 3.45% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOEG and EEV have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEV.
EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 0.00% for BOEG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 0.95% for EEV.
Find the right allocation for BOEG and EEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer