BOEG vs. EEV

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) and EEV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BOEG is actively managed, while EEV is passively managed. Over the past year, BOEG returned -4.03% vs -54.90% for EEV. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. BOEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EEV.

Performance

BOEG vs. EEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -9.75% return, which is significantly higher than EEV's -41.04% return.

BOEG

• 1D: -2.13%
• 1M: -3.15%
• YTD: -9.75%
• 6M: -11.04%
• 1Y: -4.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EEV

• 1D: -1.81%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: -41.04%
• 6M: -41.65%
• 1Y: -54.90%
• 3Y*: -33.92%
• 5Y*: -15.42%
• 10Y*: -24.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEG vs. EEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	-9.75%	6.85%
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets	-41.04%	-25.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BOEG and EEV is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	-0.33

Return for Risk

BOEG vs. EEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOEG

BOEG Risk / Return Rank: 9
BOEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BOEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BOEG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BOEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BOEG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

EEV

EEV Risk / Return Rank: 1
EEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
EEV Omega Ratio Rank: 0
EEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EEV Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOEG vs. EEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOEG	EEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	-1.21	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	-2.10	+2.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	0.75	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	-0.94	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	-1.77	+1.60

BOEG vs. EEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOEG Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is higher than the EEV Sharpe Ratio of -1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOEG and EEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOEG vs. EEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum EEV drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and EEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOEG	EEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.47%	-99.88%	+53.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.47%	-58.51%	+12.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-77.51%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.24%	-99.87%	+67.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.66%	-93.00%	+73.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.64%	31.26%	-7.62%

Volatility

BOEG vs. EEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) is 21.94%, while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets (EEV) has a volatility of 23.13%. This indicates that BOEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOEG	EEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.94%	23.13%	-1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.89%	41.57%	+5.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.38%	45.62%	+18.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.91%	39.49%	+24.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.91%	41.46%	+22.45%

BOEG vs. EEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EEV's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOEG vs. EEV - Dividend Comparison

BOEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets	7.95%	5.40%	4.45%	3.45%	0.27%	0.00%	0.14%	1.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOEG and EEV in my portfolio?

BOEG and EEV have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOEG or EEV?

EEV has higher volatility (23.13%) compared to BOEG (21.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOEG dropped -46.47% vs EEV's -99.88%.

Which ETF is better, BOEG or EEV?

On 1-year performance, BOEG leads with -4.03% vs -54.90% for EEV. On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BOEG has been the lower-risk option at 21.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOEG or EEV?

Over the 1-year period, BOEG has performed better with a -4.03% return vs -54.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOEG or EEV?

BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EEV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOEG or EEV?

EEV has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 0.00% for BOEG.

What is the main difference between BOEG and EEV?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 0.95% for EEV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.