BOEG vs. BULZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ).
BOEG and BULZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOEG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 12, 2025. BULZ is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation. It was launched on Aug 17, 2021.
Performance
BOEG vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOEG vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | -13.52% | 6.85% |
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN | -28.68% | 77.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -13.52% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's -28.68% return.
BOEG
- 1D
- 8.66%
- 1M
- -20.31%
- YTD
- -13.52%
- 6M
- -16.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BULZ
- 1D
- 5.23%
- 1M
- -12.77%
- YTD
- -28.68%
- 6M
- -31.57%
- 1Y
- 72.81%
- 3Y*
- 59.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOEG vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOEG vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank
BOEG
BULZ
BOEG vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOEG | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | -0.06 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOEG and BULZ is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BOEG vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOEG nor BULZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BOEG vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum BULZ drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and BULZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOEG | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.47% | -94.44% | +47.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.07% | -46.52% | +11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.67% | -60.15% | +42.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.25% | — |
Volatility
BOEG vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOEG | BULZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 29.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 60.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.69% | 92.48% | -30.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.69% | 91.56% | -29.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.69% | 91.56% | -29.87% |