BOEG vs. NFLU
BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) and NFLU (T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BOEG returned -0.44% vs -72.52% for NFLU. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BOEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NFLU.
Performance
BOEG vs. NFLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly higher than NFLU's -46.55% return.
BOEG
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- 1Y
- -0.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLU
- 1D
- -11.62%
- 1M
- -33.41%
- YTD
- -46.55%
- 6M
- -46.22%
- 1Y
- -72.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOEG vs. NFLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF | -7.07% | 6.85% |
NFLU T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF | -46.55% | -47.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOEG and NFLU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOEG vs. NFLU — Risk / Return Rank
BOEG
NFLU
BOEG vs. NFLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOEG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.75 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | -0.95 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.02 | -1.48 | +1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOEG vs. NFLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum NFLU drawdown of -76.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and NFLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOEG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.47% | -76.67% | +30.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.47% | -76.67% | +30.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.23% | -76.67% | +46.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.52% | -29.07% | +9.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.39% | 48.84% | -25.45% |
Volatility
BOEG vs. NFLU - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to T-REX 2X Long Netflix Daily Target ETF (NFLU) at 16.58%. This indicates that BOEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOEG | NFLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.41% | 16.58% | +4.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.04% | 50.91% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.38% | 68.00% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.07% | 69.14% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.07% | 69.14% | -5.07% |
BOEG vs. NFLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NFLU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOEG vs. NFLU - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOEG nor NFLU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOEG and NFLU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOEG has higher volatility (21.41%) compared to NFLU (16.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOEG dropped -46.47% vs NFLU's -76.67%.
On 1-year performance, BOEG leads with -0.44% vs -72.52% for NFLU. On fees, BOEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NFLU has been the lower-risk option at 16.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BOEG has performed better with a -0.44% return vs -72.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for NFLU.
BOEG and NFLU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 1.05% for NFLU.
BOEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOEG and NFLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer