BOCT vs. ZFEB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB).

BOCT and ZFEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOCT is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2018. ZFEB is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Feb 3, 2025.

Performance

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October	-2.30%	12.59%
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	0.00%	6.10%

Returns By Period

BOCT

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: -2.30%
• 6M: -0.52%
• 1Y: 14.58%
• 3Y*: 12.62%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: —

ZFEB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 6.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOCT and ZFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

BOCT

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October

ZFEB

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February

Return for Risk

BOCT vs. ZFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT

BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 65
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

ZFEB

ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 96
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BOCT	ZFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.45	-1.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	3.59	-1.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.52	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	4.21	-2.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	19.06	-10.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the ZFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and ZFEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BOCT	ZFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	2.45	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.75	-1.07

Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and ZFEB is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOCT nor ZFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than ZFEB's maximum drawdown of -3.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and ZFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOCT	ZFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.54%	-3.00%	-21.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-1.56%	-7.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	-0.84%	-2.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-0.40%	-2.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	0.38%	+1.39%

Volatility

BOCT vs. ZFEB - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) at 0.95%. This indicates that BOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOCT	ZFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	0.95%	+2.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.60%	1.66%	+4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	2.87%	+10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.06%	3.01%	+8.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.94%	3.01%	+10.93%