ZFEB vs. MAXJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ).

ZFEB and MAXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZFEB is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Feb 3, 2025. MAXJ is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jun 28, 2024.

Performance

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	0.04%	6.10%
MAXJ iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF	-0.12%	8.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZFEB achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than MAXJ's -0.12% return.

ZFEB

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 0.04%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 7.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAXJ

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 10.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MAXJ's 0.50% expense ratio.

ZFEB

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February

MAXJ

iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF

Return for Risk

ZFEB vs. MAXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZFEB

ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MAXJ

MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 91
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZFEB	MAXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	1.83	+0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	2.65	+1.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.48	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.38	2.76	+1.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.01	14.07	+5.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the MAXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZFEB and MAXJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZFEB	MAXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	1.83	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	1.40	+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between ZFEB and MAXJ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Dividend Comparison

ZFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAXJ iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF	1.01%	1.01%	0.81%

Drawdowns

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZFEB drawdown since its inception was -3.00%, smaller than the maximum MAXJ drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZFEB and MAXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZFEB	MAXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-6.35%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.73%	-3.88%	+2.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-1.06%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-0.61%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.38%	0.76%	-0.38%

Volatility

ZFEB vs. MAXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) is 0.95%, while iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that ZFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZFEB	MAXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	1.28%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.67%	1.94%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87%	5.67%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.02%	5.51%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.02%	5.51%	-2.49%