PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOCT vs. PMMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOCT vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly higher than PMMY's 2.23% return.


BOCT

1D
0.04%
1M
2.79%
YTD
7.34%
6M
8.06%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*

PMMY

1D
0.02%
1M
0.56%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.82%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOCT vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and PMMY is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025

0.78

The correlation between BOCT and PMMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOCT vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOCTPMMYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

5.48

-2.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.61

9.23

-5.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

2.50

-1.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

17.32

-13.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.80

92.16

-75.36

BOCT vs. PMMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is lower than the PMMY Sharpe Ratio of 5.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and PMMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOCTPMMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

5.48

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

4.60

-3.83

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and PMMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOCTPMMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-0.36%

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-0.36%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-0.04%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

0.07%

+1.19%

Volatility

BOCT vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) at 0.46%. This indicates that BOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOCTPMMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.46%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

0.86%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

1.12%

+7.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

1.39%

+9.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

1.39%

+12.44%

BOCT vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOCT vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOCT nor PMMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%
PMMY
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOCT and PMMY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOCT has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to PMMY (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs PMMY's -0.36%.

On 1-year performance, BOCT leads with 20.96% vs 6.12% for PMMY. On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PMMY has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BOCT has performed better with a 20.96% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BOCT.

BOCT and PMMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BOCT and 0.50% for PMMY.

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.48 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOCT and PMMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer