BOCT vs. LOUP
BOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOCT returned 10.56%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for LOUP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
BOCT vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 28.21% return.
BOCT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 20.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.58%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 75.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BOCT vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 7.17% | 14.34% | 12.36% | 21.13% | -8.14% | 14.97% | 14.69% | 19.05% | -10.25% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 28.21% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 31.76% | -23.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOCT and LOUP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BOCT and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
BOCT vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOCT
LOUP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BOCT
LOUP
Financial Services
BOCT
LOUP
Communication Services
BOCT
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
BOCT
LOUP
Healthcare
BOCT
LOUP
Industrials
BOCT
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
BOCT
LOUP
-
Energy
BOCT
LOUP
Utilities
BOCT
LOUP
Real Estate
BOCT
LOUP
-
Basic Materials
BOCT
LOUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOCT vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
BOCT
LOUP
BOCT vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 2.66 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | 3.21 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.61 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 12.23 | +3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.66 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.40 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.59 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
BOCT vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -58.68% | +34.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.09% | -21.00% | +14.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.61% | -35.23% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | -55.63% | +41.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -1.87% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -20.04% | +17.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 6.19% | -4.93% |
Volatility
BOCT vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) is 1.33%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that BOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 8.23% | -6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.11% | 21.94% | -15.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.18% | 28.51% | -20.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.09% | 32.38% | -21.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 31.96% | -18.14% |
BOCT vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BOCT vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOCT nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOCT and LOUP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to BOCT (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs LOUP's -58.68%.
On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 12.98% vs 10.56% for BOCT. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BOCT.
BOCT and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BOCT and 0.70% for LOUP.
LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOCT and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer