BOCT vs. FBUF
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF).
BOCT and FBUF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BOCT is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Price Return Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2018. FBUF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 9, 2024.
Performance
BOCT vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BOCT vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | -2.91% | 14.34% | 7.01% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | -2.37% | 14.01% | 10.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's -2.37% return.
BOCT
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- -2.91%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 14.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BOCT vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BOCT vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
BOCT
FBUF
BOCT vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOCT | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.33 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.87 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.16 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | 9.34 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOCT | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.33 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.11 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between BOCT and FBUF is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BOCT vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
BOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.67% | 0.64% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BOCT vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and FBUF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOCT | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -11.09% | -13.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -6.81% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -4.18% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -1.42% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.58% | +0.17% |
Volatility
BOCT vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 3.11%. This indicates that BOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BOCT | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 3.11% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.57% | 6.52% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 10.77% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 9.87% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 9.87% | +4.07% |