PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOCT vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOCT vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.


BOCT

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.95%
YTD
7.17%
6M
7.69%
1Y
20.28%
3Y*
14.58%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOCT vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
7.17%14.34%12.36%21.13%-8.14%14.97%14.69%19.05%-10.25%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%32.32%-5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and BUFF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.84

The correlation between BOCT and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOCT vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOCT
BUFF

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BOCT
36.2%
BUFF
36.2%

Financial Services

BOCT
11.9%
BUFF
11.9%

Communication Services

BOCT
10.9%
BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BOCT
10.1%
BUFF
10.1%

Healthcare

BOCT
8.4%
BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

BOCT
8.1%
BUFF
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

BOCT
4.9%
BUFF
4.9%

Energy

BOCT
3.5%
BUFF
3.5%

Utilities

BOCT
2.3%
BUFF
2.3%

Real Estate

BOCT
1.9%
BUFF
1.9%

Basic Materials

BOCT
1.8%
BUFF
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOCT vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOCTBUFFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.80

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

4.24

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.58

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

4.02

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.08

21.50

-5.42

BOCT vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOCTBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.80

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

1.04

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.49

+0.28

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOCTBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-46.23%

+21.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-3.58%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-10.24%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

-10.24%

-4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.27%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-6.18%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

0.67%

+0.59%

Volatility

BOCT vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that BOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOCTBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

1.02%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

3.83%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

5.15%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

8.41%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

17.67%

-3.85%

BOCT vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOCT vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOCT nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOCT and BUFF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOCT has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, BOCT leads with 10.56% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, BOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BOCT has performed better with a 10.56% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

BOCT and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BOCT and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOCT and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer