BOCT vs. BFEB
BOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October) and BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) are both exchange-traded funds - BOCT is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BOCT returned 10.35%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for BFEB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BOCT vs. BFEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than BFEB's 7.14% return.
BOCT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- —
BFEB
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BOCT vs. BFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 6.08% | 14.34% | 12.36% | 21.13% | -8.14% | 14.97% | 14.65% |
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 7.14% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 6.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOCT and BFEB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BOCT and BFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
BOCT vs. BFEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BOCT
BFEB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BOCT
BFEB
Financial Services
BOCT
BFEB
Communication Services
BOCT
BFEB
Consumer Cyclical
BOCT
BFEB
Healthcare
BOCT
BFEB
Industrials
BOCT
BFEB
Consumer Defensive
BOCT
BFEB
Energy
BOCT
BFEB
Utilities
BOCT
BFEB
Real Estate
BOCT
BFEB
Basic Materials
BOCT
BFEB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOCT vs. BFEB — Risk / Return Rank
BOCT
BFEB
BOCT vs. BFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOCT | BFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.05 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.61 | 15.50 | -0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOCT | BFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.39 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.01 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.88 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
BOCT vs. BFEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum BFEB drawdown of -26.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and BFEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOCT | BFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -26.37% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.09% | -6.41% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.61% | -13.82% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | -14.84% | +0.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.30% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -2.68% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 1.26% | +0.01% |
Volatility
BOCT vs. BFEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) is 1.76%, while Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that BOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOCT | BFEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 2.02% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.26% | 6.50% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.25% | 8.21% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 11.41% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 14.19% | -0.37% |
BOCT vs. BFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BOCT and BFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BOCT vs. BFEB - Dividend Comparison
Neither BOCT nor BFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BOCT and BFEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BFEB has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to BOCT (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs BFEB's -26.37%.
On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.48% vs 10.35% for BOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOCT and BFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BOCT and BFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BFEB is Options Trading. BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series.
BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOCT and BFEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer