PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOCT vs. BFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOCT vs. BFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than BFEB's 7.14% return.


BOCT

1D
0.17%
1M
0.44%
YTD
6.08%
6M
6.65%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*

BFEB

1D
0.23%
1M
0.42%
YTD
7.14%
6M
8.04%
1Y
19.49%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOCT vs. BFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
6.08%14.34%12.36%21.13%-8.14%14.97%14.65%
BFEB
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February
7.14%12.99%17.58%22.35%-6.76%18.05%6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and BFEB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020

0.94

The correlation between BOCT and BFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOCT vs. BFEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOCT
BFEB

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

BOCT
36.2%
BFEB
36.2%

Financial Services

BOCT
11.9%
BFEB
11.9%

Communication Services

BOCT
10.9%
BFEB
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BOCT
10.1%
BFEB
10.1%

Healthcare

BOCT
8.4%
BFEB
8.4%

Industrials

BOCT
8.1%
BFEB
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

BOCT
4.9%
BFEB
4.9%

Energy

BOCT
3.5%
BFEB
3.5%

Utilities

BOCT
2.3%
BFEB
2.3%

Real Estate

BOCT
1.9%
BFEB
1.9%

Basic Materials

BOCT
1.8%
BFEB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOCT vs. BFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BFEB
BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. BFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOCTBFEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.05

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

15.50

-0.89

BOCT vs. BFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the BFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and BFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOCTBFEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.39

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.01

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.88

-0.13

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. BFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum BFEB drawdown of -26.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and BFEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOCTBFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-26.37%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-6.41%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-13.82%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

-14.84%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.30%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-2.68%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.26%

+0.01%

Volatility

BOCT vs. BFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) is 1.76%, while Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that BOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOCTBFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

2.02%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.26%

6.50%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.25%

8.21%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

11.41%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

14.19%

-0.37%

BOCT vs. BFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BOCT and BFEB have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

BOCT vs. BFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOCT nor BFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BFEB
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BOCT and BFEB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BFEB has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to BOCT (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs BFEB's -26.37%.

On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.48% vs 10.35% for BOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOCT and BFEB have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

BOCT and BFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BFEB is Options Trading. BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series.

BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOCT and BFEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer