PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOC vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BOC vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOC achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -4.78% return.


BOC

1D
2.02%
1M
13.66%
YTD
10.35%
6M
1.41%
1Y
-3.47%
3Y*
-11.63%
5Y*
-14.96%
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
0.69%
1M
2.82%
YTD
-4.78%
6M
-4.89%
1Y
-2.52%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOC vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BOC
Boston Omaha Corp
10.35%-12.76%-9.85%-40.64%-7.76%3.91%31.42%-10.09%-27.76%145.38%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-4.78%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BOC and BRK-B is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.30

The correlation between BOC and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BOC:

$420.48M

BRK-B:

$1.03T

EPS

BOC:

-$0.44

BRK-B:

$33.62

PS Ratio

BOC:

3.72

BRK-B:

2.75

PB Ratio

BOC:

0.83

BRK-B:

1.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

BOC:

$114.89M

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BOC:

$105.55M

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

BOC:

$2.48M

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOC vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOC
BOC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOC Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOC vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOCBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.98

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

-0.27

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

-0.57

+0.27

BOC vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOC Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOC and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOCBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

-0.18

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.61

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.48

-0.47

Drawdowns

BOC vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOC drawdown since its inception was -76.58%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOC and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOCBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.58%

-53.86%

-22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.46%

-9.42%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.26%

-14.95%

-31.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.13%

-26.58%

-47.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.10%

-11.33%

-59.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.06%

-11.07%

-34.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.83%

4.46%

+7.37%

Volatility

BOC vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) has a higher volatility of 16.58% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 3.72%. This indicates that BOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOCBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.58%

3.72%

+12.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.96%

10.70%

+12.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.13%

14.32%

+17.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.28%

17.11%

+18.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.86%

19.43%

+23.43%

Dividends

BOC vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOC nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BOC vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boston Omaha Corp and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
28.25M
93.68B
(BOC) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BOC vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Boston Omaha Corp and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
87.7%
28.8%
Portfolio components
BOC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Omaha Corp reported a gross profit of 24.76M and revenue of 28.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.7%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

BOC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Omaha Corp reported an operating income of -2.19M and revenue of 28.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.8%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

BOC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Omaha Corp reported a net income of -2.15M and revenue of 28.25M, resulting in a net margin of -7.6%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BOC and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOC has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to BRK-B (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOC dropped -76.58% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

BOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOC and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer