BOBP vs. VTI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BOBP (CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BOBP tracks the CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BOBP returned 20.29% vs 21.84% for VTI. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BOBP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

BOBP vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOBP achieves a 13.31% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 10.49% return.

BOBP

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -5.76%
• 6M: 8.81%
• YTD: 13.31%
• 1Y: 20.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.09%

VTI

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: 8.77%
• YTD: 10.49%
• 1Y: 21.84%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 14.63%
• ALL TIME*: 9.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	$88.20K	$92.43K	$96.63K
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	$1.06B	$1.16B	$1.24B

BOBP vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	13.31%	7.63%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	10.49%	15.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BOBP and VTI is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2025	0.82

The correlation between BOBP and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

BOBP vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BOBP	VTI
Technology	25.9%	36.1%
Industrials	25.6%	10.2%
Financial Services	11.7%	11.8%
Utilities	6.0%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	4.3%
Healthcare	5.2%	9.7%
Energy	4.7%	3.2%
Communication Services	4.7%	9.1%
Basic Materials	4.5%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	9.4%
Real Estate	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

BOBP vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BOBP

BOBP Risk / Return Rank: 35
BOBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BOBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BOBP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BOBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BOBP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 67
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BOBP vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOBP	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	1.52	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.12	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.27	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	2.23	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	9.62	-5.24

BOBP vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOBP Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOBP and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOBP vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOBP drawdown since its inception was -16.32%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOBP and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOBP	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.32%	-55.45%	+39.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.32%	-8.92%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.24%	-1.36%	-11.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-7.99%	+5.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	2.07%	+2.29%

Volatility

BOBP vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF (BOBP) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.46%. This indicates that BOBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOBP	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.34%	3.46%	+4.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.51%	10.24%	+11.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.61%	13.10%	+10.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.86%	17.51%	+4.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.86%	18.30%	+3.56%

BOBP vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOBP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOBP vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BOBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than VTI's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOBP CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index ETF	2.92%	3.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.06%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOBP and VTI in my portfolio?

BOBP and VTI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOBP or VTI?

BOBP has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to VTI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOBP dropped -16.32% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, BOBP or VTI?

On 1-year performance, VTI leads with 21.84% vs 20.29% for BOBP. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOBP or VTI?

Over the 1-year period, VTI has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 20.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOBP or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BOBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOBP or VTI?

BOBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 1.06% for VTI.

What is the main difference between BOBP and VTI?

BOBP tracks CORE16 Best of Breed Premier Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BOBP and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.