PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOAT vs. LBAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOAT vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOAT achieves a 29.73% return, which is significantly higher than LBAY's 6.38% return.


BOAT

1D
-0.83%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
29.73%
6M
28.77%
1Y
49.09%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
10Y*

LBAY

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.38%
6M
7.19%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOAT vs. LBAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
29.73%22.77%5.97%24.53%6.26%23.18%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
6.38%4.08%-3.49%-8.54%22.41%7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BOAT and LBAY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.27

The correlation between BOAT and LBAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BOAT vs. LBAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BOAT
LBAY

Industrials

25.4%
12.5%

Energy

16.1%
11.4%

Financial Services

4.7%
15.3%

Basic Materials

-

20.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

16.3%

Healthcare

-

5.5%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Technology

-

2.8%

Utilities

-

11.2%

Industrials

BOAT
25.4%
LBAY
12.5%

Energy

BOAT
16.1%
LBAY
11.4%

Financial Services

BOAT
4.7%
LBAY
15.3%

Basic Materials

BOAT

-

LBAY
20.8%

Communication Services

BOAT

-

LBAY

-

Consumer Cyclical

BOAT

-

LBAY
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

BOAT

-

LBAY
16.3%

Healthcare

BOAT

-

LBAY
5.5%

Real Estate

BOAT

-

LBAY
2.8%

Technology

BOAT

-

LBAY
2.8%

Utilities

BOAT

-

LBAY
11.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOAT vs. LBAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOAT
BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

LBAY
LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOAT vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BOATLBAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.10

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

0.66

+3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.13

1.67

+11.46

BOAT vs. LBAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the LBAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOAT and LBAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BOATLBAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

0.51

+1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.58

+0.35

Drawdowns

BOAT vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOAT drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOAT and LBAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOATLBAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-15.99%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-11.91%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.94%

-14.57%

-19.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.70%

-10.72%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.70%

-6.80%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

4.66%

-0.91%

Volatility

BOAT vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison

SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a higher volatility of 7.60% compared to Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) at 3.78%. This indicates that BOAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOATLBAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.60%

3.78%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

12.87%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.77%

15.25%

+4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

13.59%

+11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.12%

13.73%

+11.39%

BOAT vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOAT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOAT vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison

BOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, more than LBAY's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
6.32%8.08%13.89%13.65%13.57%1.36%0.00%
LBAY
Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF
3.80%3.80%3.77%3.47%2.74%2.96%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOAT and LBAY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOAT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to LBAY (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOAT dropped -33.94% vs LBAY's -15.99%.

On 3-year performance, BOAT leads with 27.56% vs 3.38% for LBAY. On fees, BOAT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, LBAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 27.56% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOAT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for LBAY.

BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 3.80% for LBAY.

BOAT is categorized as Transportation Equities, while LBAY is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for BOAT and 1.09% for LBAY.

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOAT and LBAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer