PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BNZL.L is traded in GBp, while ^SP500TR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^SP500TR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNZL.L achieves a 19.21% return, which is significantly higher than ^SP500TR's 11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, BNZL.L has underperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 4.17%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.


BNZL.L

1D
1.26%
1M
1.18%
YTD
19.21%
6M
14.58%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
-5.61%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
4.17%

^SP500TR

1D
0.42%
1M
5.57%
YTD
11.81%
6M
10.50%
1Y
29.83%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNZL.L
Bunzl plc
19.21%-35.01%5.63%18.04%-2.45%20.80%23.20%-10.71%16.71%0.07%
^SP500TR
S&P 500 Total Return
11.81%9.48%27.20%19.98%-8.37%29.92%14.92%26.48%1.29%11.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BNZL.L and ^SP500TR is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between BNZL.L and ^SP500TR has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNZL.L
BNZL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BNZL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

^SP500TR
^SP500TR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SP500TR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNZL.L^SP500TRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.49

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

3.98

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.77

15.35

-14.58

BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNZL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNZL.L and ^SP500TR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNZL.L^SP500TRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

2.60

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.97

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.91

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.69

-0.21

Drawdowns

BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNZL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.72%, which is greater than ^SP500TR's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNZL.L and ^SP500TR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNZL.L^SP500TRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.72%

-34.87%

-13.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.45%

-7.54%

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.42%

-21.89%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.42%

-21.89%

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.72%

-25.86%

-22.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.84%

0.00%

-30.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.27%

-4.76%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

1.95%

+9.55%

Volatility

BNZL.L vs. ^SP500TR - Volatility Comparison

Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 2.60%. This indicates that BNZL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNZL.L^SP500TRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

2.60%

+4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.80%

8.20%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.68%

11.52%

+9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

15.85%

+6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.06%

18.15%

+4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNZL.L and ^SP500TR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNZL.L and ^SP500TR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer