PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNZL.L vs. CPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) and Compass Group plc (CPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNZL.L
Bunzl plc
8.57%-35.01%5.63%18.04%-2.45%20.80%23.20%-10.71%16.71%0.07%
CPG.L
Compass Group plc
-351.47%-1,606.80%-1,682.39%-2,443.56%1,277.77%21.13%-295.65%-762.26%-1,036.90%193.19%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

BNZL.L:

£23.62B

CPG.L:

£76.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BNZL.L:

£3.39B

CPG.L:

£16.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

BNZL.L:

£2.30B

CPG.L:

£5.79B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNZL.L achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than CPG.L's -351.47% return.


BNZL.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.71%
YTD
8.57%
6M
-4.59%
1Y
-23.34%
3Y*
-7.43%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
3.58%

CPG.L

1D
-1.29%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-351.47%
6M
-335.53%
1Y
-795.13%
3Y*
5Y*
1,064.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bunzl plc

Compass Group plc

Return for Risk

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNZL.L
BNZL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BNZL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNZL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CPG.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) and Compass Group plc (CPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNZL.LCPG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.69

-0.48

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.65

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-67.58

+66.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

-4.62

+3.66

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNZL.LCPG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.82

-1.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.45

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between BNZL.L and CPG.L is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Dividend Comparison

BNZL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than CPG.L's 219.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNZL.L
Bunzl plc
3.28%3.56%2.13%1.99%2.11%1.89%3.58%2.45%1.99%2.08%1.86%1.92%
CPG.L
Compass Group plc
219.69%204.17%166.92%173.41%122.40%0.00%197.96%204.32%210.33%578.29%201.81%234.76%

Drawdowns

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNZL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.72%, smaller than the maximum CPG.L drawdown of -12,360.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNZL.L and CPG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNZL.LCPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.72%

-12,360.17%

+12,311.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.32%

-332.54%

+299.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.42%

-2,460.37%

+2,415.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.72%

-3,064.76%

+3,016.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.01%

-4.08%

-32.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-711.14%

+702.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.30%

169.91%

-145.61%

Volatility

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bunzl plc (BNZL.L) is 6.99%, while Compass Group plc (CPG.L) has a volatility of 11.50%. This indicates that BNZL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNZL.LCPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

11.50%

-4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

12.08%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.63%

415.38%

-381.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

582.62%

-559.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.94%

502.22%

-479.28%

Financials

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunzl plc and Compass Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
8.97B
17.51B
(BNZL.L) Total Revenue
(CPG.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

BNZL.L vs. CPG.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bunzl plc and Compass Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
-2.3%
6.5%
Portfolio components
BNZL.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bunzl plc reported a gross profit of -202.25M and revenue of 8.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -2.3%.

CPG.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Compass Group plc reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 17.51B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.5%.

BNZL.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bunzl plc reported an operating income of 585.05M and revenue of 8.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.

CPG.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Compass Group plc reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 17.51B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.5%.

BNZL.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bunzl plc reported a net income of 368.25M and revenue of 8.97B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.

CPG.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Compass Group plc reported a net income of 707.11M and revenue of 17.51B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.