BNS vs. SU
BNS (The Bank of Nova Scotia) and SU (Suncor Energy Inc.) are both stocks. BNS operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while SU operates in Oil & Gas Integrated (Energy). Over the past 10 years, BNS returned 11.61%/yr vs 13.39%/yr for SU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNS vs. SU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNS achieves a 16.52% return, which is significantly lower than SU's 40.87% return. Over the past 10 years, BNS has underperformed SU with an annualized return of 11.61%, while SU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.
BNS
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- YTD
- 16.52%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 62.38%
- 3Y*
- 27.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
SU
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- 40.87%
- 6M
- 40.84%
- 1Y
- 55.65%
- 3Y*
- 32.55%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
BNS vs. SU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 16.52% | 45.11% | 17.55% | 8.53% | -28.05% | 40.62% | 1.70% | 17.49% | -18.28% | 21.83% |
SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 40.87% | 29.69% | 16.22% | 6.40% | 32.31% | 54.94% | -46.67% | 22.10% | -21.27% | 17.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNS and SU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1999 | 0.42 |
The correlation between BNS and SU shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BNS:
$76.13B
SU:
$73.24B
BNS:
CA$8.23
SU:
CA$5.24
BNS:
14.26
SU:
16.42
BNS:
1.93
SU:
2.00
BNS:
1.38
SU:
2.24
BNS:
CA$70.57B
SU:
CA$52.01B
BNS:
CA$33.43B
SU:
CA$28.85B
BNS:
CA$13.61B
SU:
CA$16.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNS vs. SU — Risk / Return Rank
BNS
SU
BNS vs. SU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) and Suncor Energy Inc. (SU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNS | SU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.42 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 5.44 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.38 | 14.28 | +4.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNS vs. SU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNS drawdown since its inception was -63.65%, smaller than the maximum SU drawdown of -80.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNS and SU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNS | SU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.65% | -80.22% | +16.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.36% | -11.65% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -22.42% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.12% | -36.58% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -73.54% | +27.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.07% | +11.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -27.40% | +16.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 4.43% | -1.03% |
Volatility
BNS vs. SU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) is 4.91%, while Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) has a volatility of 9.48%. This indicates that BNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNS | SU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 9.48% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 19.83% | -6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 24.41% | -7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 32.95% | -13.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 36.91% | -14.99% |
Dividends
BNS vs. SU - Dividend Comparison
BNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than SU's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNS The Bank of Nova Scotia | 3.79% | 4.17% | 5.85% | 8.56% | 6.39% | 5.09% | 4.93% | 3.53% | 6.34% | 4.80% | 5.24% | 8.13% |
SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 2.78% | 3.72% | 4.51% | 5.27% | 4.56% | 3.34% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.24% | 4.16% | 3.55% | 4.42% |
Financials
BNS vs. SU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Bank of Nova Scotia and Suncor Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BNS vs. SU - Profitability Comparison
BNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a gross profit of 8.40B and revenue of 17.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.
SU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.53B and revenue of 15.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.
BNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported an operating income of 3.43B and revenue of 17.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.
SU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 2.90B and revenue of 15.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.
BNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a net income of 2.59B and revenue of 17.18B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
SU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a net income of 2.10B and revenue of 15.42B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNS and SU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SU has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to BNS (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNS dropped -63.65% vs SU's -80.22%.
BNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNS and SU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer