BNOV vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BNOV is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BNOV returned 8.73%/yr vs 24.41%/yr for UGA. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

BNOV vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNOV achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.

BNOV

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 7.93%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: 19.67%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -12.25%
• YTD: 70.69%
• 6M: 59.72%
• 1Y: 79.48%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: 24.41%
• 10Y*: 14.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNOV vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November	7.93%	13.23%	12.49%	17.24%	-9.63%	10.61%	11.82%	3.70%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	70.69%	-2.00%	3.77%	1.27%	46.34%	68.49%	-24.88%	2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BNOV and UGA is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019	0.14

The correlation between BNOV and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BNOV vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNOV

BNOV Risk / Return Rank: 73
BNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
BNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 70
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNOV vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNOV	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.27	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	2.71	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.37	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	5.37	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.20	12.86	+1.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNOV vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNOV Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNOV and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNOV	UGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.27	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	0.71	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.12	+0.60

Drawdowns

BNOV vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNOV drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNOV and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNOV	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.66%	-86.59%	+61.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.57%	-14.88%	+8.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.70%	-26.68%	+12.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.27%	-38.11%	+21.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-14.75%	+14.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-36.76%	+33.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	6.20%	-4.81%

Volatility

BNOV vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (BNOV) is 1.72%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that BNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNOV	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	11.64%	-9.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.58%	30.48%	-23.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.33%	35.27%	-26.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.82%	34.40%	-22.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.04%	37.27%	-23.23%

BNOV vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNOV vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNOV nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNOV and UGA in my portfolio?

BNOV and UGA have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNOV or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to BNOV (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNOV dropped -24.66% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, BNOV or UGA?

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 24.41% vs 8.73% for BNOV. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BNOV has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNOV or UGA?

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 24.41% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNOV or UGA?

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNOV or UGA?

BNOV and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BNOV and UGA?

BNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UGA is Oil & Gas. BNOV tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BNOV and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.